Volume 3, Issue 2 (6-2018)                   hrjbaq 2018, 3(2): 101-108 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Besharat M A, Afshari A, Shah Hosseini M. Comparing Attitudes toward Improving Performance and Muscularity in Athletes with or without the use of Un-authorized Substances in the both forms of Team and Individual Disciplines . hrjbaq. 2018; 3 (2) :101-108
URL: http://hrjbaq.ir/article-1-198-en.html
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. , (amirhosseinafshari65@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (1022 Views)

Introduction: For many years, the prevalence of performance-enhancer substances using among athletes is still growing despite many prohibitions, and it seems that psychological factors play a role in it. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to compare the performance enhancement attitude and muscularity in some athletes with and without the use of illegal substance in both forms of team and individual sports.
Materials and methods: The statistical population of the present study was male athletes of some individual and team disciplines in Tehran city in 2016. In total of 335 athletes were selected based on available sampling at three levels of beginner, semi-skilled and skilled. Data were collected by two attitude questionnaires of improving performance and desire for muscularity, along with a supplement to the demographic questionnaire, by two groups of athletes with and without use of unauthorized substance. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22 and one way ANOVA and MANOVA tests.
Results: Individual athletes have a higher mean in their desire to muscularity and their two subcomponents (muscle-related behaviors and substance use) are higher than those in the team group. But there was no difference between the attitudes related to muscle building and the attitude component to improving the performance of team and individual athletes. Also, the tendency to muscularity and its two sub-components (muscle related behaviors and performance-enhancer drugs) are higher in the athletes of the team and individual disciplines consuming unauthorized substances than others. About attitude toward improving performance, individual athletes in the group of drug user showed a higher mean than non-consuming group, but in team athletes, there was no difference in attitude toward performance improvement between the two groups.
Conclusion: In order to identify and prevent the use of unwanted substances by athletes, the recognition of psychological factors, as well as attention to the nature of team and individuality of exercise, which can affect the attitudes of athletes, is of particular importance.

Full-Text [PDF 509 kb]   (306 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/10/15 | Revised: 2018/11/7 | Accepted: 2018/05/6 | ePublished ahead of print: 2018/06/2 | Published: 2018/06/2

1. Kanayama G, Pope HG. History and epidemiology of anabolic androgens in athletes and non-athletes. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2017; 1, 25-36.
2. Christiansen AV. Uneven book on doping and public health. Idrottsforum. org. 2017.
3. Kanayama G, Hudson JI, Pope HG. Features of men with anabolic-androgenic steroid dependence: A comparison with nondependent AAS users and with AAS nonusers. Drug & Alcohol Dependence. 2009 Jun 1;102(1):130-7.
4. Thorlindsson T, Halldorsson V. Sport, and use of anabolic androgenic steroids among Icelandic high school students: a critical test of three perspectives. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy. 2010; 5(1):32.
5. WADA. World Anti-Doping Code. Retrieved January 10th, 2011. http://www.wada-ama.org/en/World-Anti- Doping-Program/Sports-and-Anti-Doping-Organizations. 2011.
6. Holzgraefe M, Veintimilla N, Bahr R. Ergogenic aids, doping, and anti‐doping. Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science: Volleyball. 2017:197-205.
7. Pope Jr HG, Wood RI, Rogol A, Nyberg F, Bowers L, Bhasin S. Adverse health consequences of performance-enhancing drugs: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocrine reviews. 2013; 35(3):341-75.
8. Bloodworth AJ, Petróczi A, Bailey R, Pearce G, McNamee MJ. Doping and supplementation: the attitudes of talented young athletes. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2012; 22(2):293-301.
9. Shahhosseni, M., Ggrayagh-Zandi, F., Hassani Sangani, M. Comparison of General health and tapering on mood state in bodybuilder anabolic- androgenic steroid (AAS) user and non-user. Journal of Development and motor learning, 2015, 8(3); 517-30. (persian)
10. Morrison TR, Ricci LA, Melloni RH. Anabolic/androgenic steroid administration during adolescence and adulthood differentially modulates aggression and anxiety. Hormones and behavior, 2015; 69:132-8.
11. Harmer PA. Anabolic-androgenic steroid use among young male and female athletes: is the game to blame?. British journal of sports medicine. 2010; 44(1):26-31.
12. Vassallo MJ, Olrich TW. Confidence by injection: male users of anabolic steroids speak of increases in perceived confidence through anabolic steroid use. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2010; 8(1):70-80.
13. Petróczi A, Aidman E. Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: Review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2009 May 31;10(3):390-6.
14. Kraus SJ. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and social psychology bulletin. 1995; 21(1):58-75.
15. Chan DK, Keatley DA, Tang TC, Dimmock JA, Hagger MS. Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping: Which better predicts athletes’ vigilance towards unintentional doping?. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2017 Jun 2.
16. Babusa B, Czeglédi E, Túry F, Mayville SB, Urbán R. Differentiating the levels of risk for muscle dysmorphia among Hungarian male weightlifters: A factor mixture modeling approach. Body image. 2015; 12:14-21.
17. Hale BD, Diehl D, Weaver K, Briggs M. Exercise dependence and muscle dysmorphia in novice and experienced female bodybuilders. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2013; 2(4):244-8.
18. McCreary DR, Saucier DM. Drive for muscularity, body comparison, and social physique anxiety in men and women. Body Image. 2009; 6(1):24-30.
19. Edwards C, Tod D, Molnar G, Markland D. Predicting muscularity-related behavior, emotions, and cognitions in men: The role of psychological need thwarting, drive for muscularity, and mesomorphic internalization. Body image. 2016 Sep 30;18:108-12.
20. Edwards C, Tod D, Molnar G. A systematic review of the drive for muscularity research area. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2014; 7(1):18-41.
21. Cafri G, Thompson JK, Ricciardelli L, McCabe M, Smolak L, Yesalis C. Pursuit of the muscular ideal: Physical and psychological consequences and putative risk factors. Clinical psychology review. 2005 Feb 1;25(2):215-39.
22. Dunn JG, Dunn JC, Gotwals JK, Vallance JK, Craft JM, Syrotuik DG. Establishing construct validity evidence for the Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2006; 7(1):57-79.
23. Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR. Applying educational research: How to read, do, and use research to solve problems of practice. Pearson Higher Ed; 2014 May 6.
24. Molodi R, Nonahal, Dadkhah, A. Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Drive for Muscularity Scale in Gorganian Body Builders. Journal of psychological model and method, 2014; 10 (2): 15-26
25. Manouchehr J, Tojari F. Development and validation of instruments to measure doping attitudes and doping beliefs. Euro J Exp Bio. 2013;3(2):183-6.
26. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310(20):2191–2194.
27. Alaranta A, Alaranta H, Holmila J, Palmu P, Pietilä K, Helenius I. Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport. International journal of sports medicine. 2006; 27(10):842-6.
28. Petty RE, Wegener DT, Fabrigar LR. Attitudes and attitude change. Annual review of psychology. 1997; 48(1):609-47.
29. Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. The construction of attitudes. In A. Tesser, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes, 2011; Vol. 1 (pp. 412–435). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
30. Morente-Sánchez J, Zabala M. Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports Medicine. 2013; 43(6):395
31. Zelli A, Lucidi F, Mallia L. The relationships among adolescents’ drive for muscularity, drive for thinness, doping attitudes, and doping intentions. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology. 2010; 4(1):39-52.
32. Haerinejad MJ, Ostovar A, Farzaneh MR, Keshavarz M. The prevalence and characteristics of performance-enhancing drug use among bodybuilding athletes in the south of Iran, Bushehr. Asian journal of sports medicine. 2016; 7(3).
33. Barkoukis V, Lazuras L, Tsorbatzoudis H. Beliefs about the causes of success in sports and susceptibility for doping use in adolescent athletes. Journal of sports sciences. 2014; 32(3):212-9.
34. Hildebrandt T, Harty S, Langenbucher JW. Fitness supplements as a gateway substance for anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2012; 26(4):955.
35. Tod D, Lavallee D. Towards a conceptual understanding of muscle dysmorphia development and sustainment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2010; 3(2):111-31.
36. Lucidi F, Zelli A, Mallia L, Grano C, Russo PM, Violani C. The social-cognitive mechanisms regulating adolescents' use of doping substances. Journal of sports sciences. 2008; 26(5):447-56.
37. Kong P, Harris LM. The sporting body: body image and eating disorder symptomatology among female athletes from leanness focused and nonleanness focused sports. The journal of psychology. 2015; 149(2):141-60.
38. González-Martí I, Bustos JG, Hernández-Martínez A, Jordán OR. Physical perceptions and self-concept in athletes with muscle dysmorphia symptoms. The Spanish journal of psychology. 2014; 17: 165-176.
39. Galli N, Petrie T, Reel JJ, Greenleaf C, Carter JE. Psychosocial predictors of drive for muscularity in male collegiate athletes. Body image. 2015; 14:62-6
40. Steinfeldt JA, Gilchrist GA, Halterman AW, Gomory A, Steinfeldt MC. Drive for muscularity and conformity to masculine norms among college football players. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2011; 12(4):324.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Health Research Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb