Volume 1, Issue 2 (3-2016)                   hrjbaq 2016, 1(2): 123-131 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hatef B, Yaribeygi H, Meftahi G H, Shiri S. Individual and Community Values Conflict with the Approach of Cognitive Science and Reduction Strategies to Increase Mental Health; an Opinion Study . hrjbaq. 2016; 1 (2) :123-131
URL: http://hrjbaq.ir/article-1-37-en.html
Neuroscience Research Center; Baqiyatallah University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran , boshrahatef@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5953 Views)

Classification of human value are based on the understanding experiences (physical and emotional) and education. The grading of values and beliefs are dependent to receiving bonuses and avoid damaging which change during life. If the person see conflicts between his believes and past educations with what’s happening go on inconsistency. Site of identifying conflicts and or high risk selection was recognized in cingulate cortex. Feeling paradox activate a new decision-making processes in the brain to make the change. In fact, during an adaptation process; the person is classified his believes to achievement a new adjustment. Feeling paradox can make stress and insecurity feeling that damaged to brain heath. In different people in range of the normal distribution, the compliance are variable. As a result, the majority of the population headed toward compliance with the values of the dominant norm, while not necessarily the dominant values in accordance with the nature and mental health. Therefore, correcting the dominant values of society is a critical step in providing mental health from the perspective of cognitive function of the brain.

Full-Text [PDF 636 kb]   (2268 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: General
Received: 2016/03/15 | Revised: 2019/11/12 | Accepted: 2016/04/23 | Published: 2016/05/24

1. O'Connor BP, Dvorak T. Conditional associations between parental behavior and adolescent problems: A search for personality–environment interactions. Journal of Research in Personality. 2001;35(1):1-26.
2. Falk EB, Hyde LW, Mitchell C, Faul J, Gonzalez R, Heitzeg MM, et al. What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(44):17615-22.
3. Crocker LD, Heller W, Warren SL, O'Hare AJ, Infantolino ZP, Miller GA. Relationships among cognition, emotion, and motivation: implications for intervention and neuroplasticity in psychopathology. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:261.
4. Moyal N, Henik A, Anholt GE. Cognitive strategies to regulate emotions-current evidence and future directions. Front Psychol. 2014;4:1019.
5. Salzman CD, Fusi S. Emotion, cognition, and mental state representation in amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:173-202.
6. Brophy J. Goal Theorists Should Move on From Performance Goals. Educational Psychologist. 2005;40(3):167-76.
7. Elliot AJ. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist. 1999;34(3):169-89.
8. Jamieson L. Cognitive dissonance: progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Edited By Eddie Harmon-Jones & Judson Mills. American Psychological Association distributed by The Eurospan Group, 1999, ISBN 1-55798-565-0. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 2001;11(S1):S34-S7.
9. Rolls ET. A biased activation theory of the cognitive and attentional modulation of emotion. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:74.
10. Eisenberg N. Altruistic Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior (PLE: Emotion): Psychology Press; 2014.
11. Haken H. Principles of brain functioning: a synergetic approach to brain activity, behavior and cognition: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
12. Wyer RS. Stereotype activation and inhibition: Advances in social cognition: Psychology Press; 2013.
13. Zou L, Zhang Y, Yuan L, Qian N, Zhou R. Emotion cognitive reappraisal research based on simultaneous recording of EEG and BOLD responses. Advances in Neural Networks–ISNN 2013: Springer; 2013. p. 52-9.
14. Banks SJ, Eddy KT, Angstadt M, Nathan PJ, Phan KL. Amygdala–frontal connectivity during emotion regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2007;2(4):303-12.
15. Sylvester CM, Corbetta M, Raichle ME, Rodebaugh TL, Schlaggar BL, Sheline YI, et al. Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(9):527-35.
16. Silvetti M, Alexander W, Verguts T, Brown JW. From conflict management to reward-based decision making: actors and critics in primate medial frontal cortex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;46 Pt 1:44-57.
17. Sporns O. Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(5):652-60.
18. Cohen MX, Heller AS, Ranganath C. Functional connectivity with anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices during decision-making. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;23(1):61-70.
19. Meichenbaum D. Cognitive behaviour modification. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 1977;6(4):185-92.
20. Beck JS. Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond: Guilford Press; 2011.
21. Dreisbach G, Fischer R. The role of affect and reward in the conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:342.
22. Bonugli R, Lesser J, Escandon S, Browne G, Cashin A, Graham I, et al. experiences of cognitive behavioural therapy. Mental Health Practice. 2013;17(3):13.
23. Administration SS. Social security programs throughout the world: Asia and the Pacific: Government Printing Office; 2013.
24. Maurer U, Tackmann B, Coretti S. Key Exchange with Unilateral Authentication: Composable Security Definition and Modular Protocol Design. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive. 2013;2013:555.
25. Matusitz JA. Terrorism & communication: A critical introduction: Sage Loa Angeles; 2013.
26. Brooks DJ. What is security: Definition through knowledge categorization. Security Journal. 2010;23(3):225-39.
27. Benson SG, Dundis SP. Understanding and motivating health care employees: integrating Maslow's hierarchy of needs, training and technology. Journal of nursing management. 2003;11(5):315-20.
28. McLeod S. Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Available from interne t: http://www simplypsychology org/maslow html. 2007.
29. Poston B. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. surgical technologist. 2009:348.
30. Harries T. Feeling secure or being secure? Why it can seem better not to protect yourself against a natural hazard. Health, risk & society. 2008;10(5):479-90.
31. Zalenski RJ, Raspa R. Maslow's hierarchy of needs: a framework for achieving human potential in hospice. Journal of palliative medicine. 2006;9(5):1120-7.
32. Cobern WW. Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. 1996.
33. Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Rosenblatt A, Veeder M, Kirkland S, et al. Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1990;58(2):308.
34. Nicholi Jr AM. Definition and Significance of a Worldview. دستینه of spirituality and worldview in clinical practice. 2004:1.
35. مرتضی م. جهان بینی توحیدی 1357.
36. جواد م. ترجمه اصول کافی: ولی‌عصر; 1375.
37. جعفری اشحمب. تحف العقول عن آل الرسول صلی‌الله علیهم: دار الکتب الاسلامیه; 1380. 496 p.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2021 All Rights Reserved | Health Research Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb