Volume 7, Issue 3 (5-2022)                   hrjbaq 2022, 7(3): 231-241 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbasian M. Effect of Information and Communication Technology and Renewable Energies on Health Costs in Iran. hrjbaq. 2022; 7 (3) :231-241
URL: http://hrjbaq.ir/article-1-590-en.html
Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Humanities, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran. , (abbasian503@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (225 Views)

Introduction: Many studies have examined the relationship between economic growth, environmental pollution, and health expenditures by combining different variables. However, the role of ICT and renewable energy consumption in health expenditures has been overlooked. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the dynamic links between health expenditures, environmental pollution, economic growth, information and communication technology and renewable energy consumption in Iran.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical and applied study was performed using time series data extracted from the World Bank and Iran Statistics Center from 1981 to 2019 for Iran. In this study, the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model to evaluate the long-term and short-term dynamic, unit root tests and diagnostic tests CUSUM and CUSUMQ and Canonical Co-Integrating Regression (CCR) Dynamic least squares (DOLS), and fully modified least squares (FMOLS) have been used to validate the results of ADRL estimates in Eviews12 software.
Results: The results of ARDL estimation method showed that in the long run, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth have a positive effect on health expenditures with a coefficient of 0.829 and 1.065, respectively. Renewable energy consumption with coefficient -0.0808 was a significant negative role in reducing health expenditures. The coefficient of -0.286 obtained for the information and communication technology variable at the level of 95% indicates a reduction in health expenditures in parallel with the development of information and communication technology. Short-term results also showed that COE with a coefficient of 0.193 has a positive effect on HE. In addition, EG has a positive effect on HE with a coefficient of 0.828. Also, ICT and REC with coefficients of -0.199 and -0.080 have a negative effect on HE. CUSUM and CUSUM squares confirmed the stability of the parameters and CCR, DOLS and FMOLS regressions confirmed the results of ADRL model.
Conclusion: Increasing economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions had a positive effect and the consumption of renewable energy and information and communication technology had a short-term and long-term negative effect on health expenditures; Therefore, policies to maintain sustainability, reduce environmental pollution, focus on renewable energy projects, as well as invest in information and communication technology equipment and infrastructure will be beneficial.

Author Contribution: The whole study was done by the author.
Conflict of Interest/Funding/Supports: No conflict of interest and funding supports.
Ethical Considerations: All ethical concerns respected in this study.
Applicable Remarks: To help for understanding the impact of Information and Communication Technology and Renewable Energy on Health Expenditures in Iran.
 

Full-Text [PDF 1497 kb]   (72 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2022/05/20 | Revised: 2022/09/7 | Accepted: 2022/07/2 | ePublished ahead of print: 2022/07/2 | Published: 2022/07/17

References
1. Shahzad K, Jianqiu Z, Hashim M, Nazam M, Wang L. Impact of using information and communication technology and renewable energy on health expenditure: A case study from Pakistan. Energy. 2020;204:117956.
2. Wickramasinghe N, Misra S. A wireless trust model for healthcare. International journal of electronic healthcare. 2004;1:60-77. DOI: 10.1504/IJEH.2004.004658
3. Danish, Khan N, Baloch MA, Saud S, Fatima T. The effect of ICT on CO(2) emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matters? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(23):22850-60. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2379-2 PMID: 29855885
4. Dehghan Shabani Z, Shahnazi R. Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: A panel causality analysis. Energy. 2019;169(C):1064-78.
5. World Health Organization. Health in the Green Economy. 2021.
6. Danish, Zhang B, Wang B, Wang Z. Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;156:855-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203
7. Wong CM, Vichit-Vadakan N, Kan H, Qian Z. Public Health and Air Pollution in Asia (PAPA): a multicity study of short-term effects of air pollution on mortality. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(9):1195-202. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11257 PMID: 18795163
8. Wang Z, Asghar MM, Zaidi SAH, Wang B. Dynamic linkages among CO(2) emissions, health expenditures, and economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26(15):15285-99. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04876-x PMID: 30929174
9. Chaabouni S, Saidi K. The dynamic links between carbon dioxide (CO(2)) emissions, health spending and GDP growth: A case study for 51 countries. Environ Res. 2017;158:137-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.041 PMID: 28624630
10. Haseeb M, Kot S, Hussain HI, Jermsittiparsert K. Impact of Economic Growth, Environmental Pollution, and Energy Consumption on Health Expenditure and R&D Expenditure of ASEAN Countries. Energies. 2019;12(19). DOI: 10.3390/en12193598
11. Chen L, Zhuo Y, Xu Z, Xu X, Gao X. Is Carbon Dioxide (CO(2)) Emission an Important Factor Affecting Healthcare Expenditure? Evidence from China, 2005-2016. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019;16(20):3995. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16203995 PMID: 31635413
12. Li F, Chang T, Wang M-C, Zhou J. The relationship between health expenditure, CO(2) emissions, and economic growth in the BRICS countries-based on the Fourier ARDL model. Environmental science and pollution research international. 2022;29(8):10908-27. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17900-w PMID: 35000176
13. Chen F, Chen Z. Cost of economic growth: Air pollution and health expenditure. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;755:142543. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142543
14. Fuller R, Landrigan PJ, Balakrishnan K, Bathan G, Bose-O'Reilly S, Brauer M, et al. Pollution and health: a progress update. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0
15. Golkhandan A. Measuring the Impacts of Air Pollution on Health Costs in Iran. hrjbaq. 2017;2(3):157-66. DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.hrjbaq.2.3.157
16. Mahdi S, Simin G. The Impact of Economic Growth and Environmental Quality on Health Expenditures in Iran; Aggregate in Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model. Health Res J. 2020;5(4):224-34.
17. statistical information and data, climate and environment [Internet]. (2022).
18. Sadegh K, Saeed M, Koorosh E, Yousef R, Hamid G, Marzieh R. Evaluation of the Association between Air Pollutants and Number of Cases with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Recorded at Emergency Medical Centers in Tehran, Iran in 2013. J Health Res Community. 2016;2(2):37-43.
19. Omidvar K, Shahaeian S, Amiri Esfandegheh M. Relation between Concentration of Pollutants and Some Climatic Parameters on Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disease Mortality in Shiraz. SSU_Journals. 2020;28(3):2467-78. DOI: 10.18502/ssu.v28i3.3744
20. Usman M, Ma Z, Wasif Zafar M, Haseeb A, Ashraf RU. Are Air Pollution, Economic and Non-Economic Factors Associated with Per Capita Health Expenditures? Evidence from Emerging Economies. Inter J Environmet Res & Public Health. 2019;16(11). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16111967
21. Fatemeh N, Abbas Alavi R, Seyed Nematallah M. The effect of information and communication technology on the consumption of renewable and non-renewable energy in OECD member countries. J Agricultur Eco Res. 2021;13(3):167-77.
22. Hashem Pesaran M, Yongcheol S, Richard JS. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Applied Eco. 2001;16(3):289-326.
23. Engle R, Granger C. Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica. 1987;55(2):251-76.
24. Johansen S, Juselius K. Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration--With Applications to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Eco & Statistic. 1990;52(2):169-210.
25. Fatahi A, Mir SM, Sakhi F. Analyzing the Relationship between Economic Growth, Environmental Quality and Public Health in OPEC Member States: A Panel Data Approach. Iranian J Agricultur Economic & Develop. 2020;51(4):635-45.
26. Zaidi S, Saidi K. Environmental pollution, health expenditure and economic growth in the Sub-Saharan Africa countries: Panel ARDL approach. Sustain City & Society. 2018;41:833-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.034
27. Bedir S. Healthcare Expenditure and Economic Growth in Developing Countries. Advanc in Economic & Business. 2016;4:76-86. DOI: 10.13189/aeb.2016.040202
28. Ullah I, Rehman A, Khan F, Shah M, Khan F. Nexus between trade, CO2 emissions, renewable energy, and health expenditure in Pakistan. Inter J Health Plan & Manag. 2019;35. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2912
29. Higón D, Gholami R, Shirazi F. ICT and Environmental Sustainability A Global Perspective. Telematics and Informatics. 2017;34. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.001

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Health Research Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb